The president is extremely powerful in regards to sending troops into armed conflict because1/21/2024 "The Bush philosophy says that the constitution's wartime powers give him unlimited power to conduct a war on terror anywhere in the world," Silliman said. The speakers approached the topic from different academic disciplines but joined in urging more national debate about the appropriate level of presidential power during a struggle against terrorism.ĭespite a clear constitutional precedent for expanded presidential power during wartime, Silliman said a war on terror presents unusual circumstances - such as the lack of clear battlefields or likelihood of a decisive ending - that have legal scholars raising new questions. Silliman and three other Duke faculty members spoke this past Thursday at a talk on "Iraq, Torture and Domestic Spying: What's the Right Strategy in the War on Terror?" sponsored by the new Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, a joint venture of Duke, UNC-Chapel Hill and RTI International. But since then the argument permeates nearly every issue that has risen in the war: the long-term detention of prisoners at GuantanamoBay, the so-called "black sites" in Europe and expanded surveillance inside the United States." "That's an argument many Americans supported after 9/11. "In fulfillment of these responsibilities, he believes neither the courts nor Congress can thwart him. "President Bush's argument is the president is commander-in-chief, and he is responsible to the American people to safeguard them," said law professor Scott Silliman. But nearly six years after the 9/11 attacks, several Duke faculty members are asking where the limits on that power should now be drawn. Constitution is clear: During war, the president has expanded powers to protect the nation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |